Collaboration without compromise.

Red Quill Society works in partnership — but not without limits.
Our collaborations are designed to strengthen evidence integrity, protect sources, and ensure that environmental accountability work is conducted responsibly, lawfully, and without compromise.
We partner selectively, transparently, and with clear roles.
Red Quill Society is an independent evidence and documentation body.
Partnerships exist to support that role — not to influence findings, accelerate disclosure, or shape outcomes.
We do not operate as a campaign platform, advocacy arm, or enforcement body.
Partnerships are built around shared values, not shared messaging.
Red Quill Society collaborates with organisations and individuals whose work aligns with rigorous evidence standards and ethical restraint, including:
Partnerships may be project-based, advisory, or long-term.
Depending on scope and mandate, partnerships may include:
All collaborations are governed by written agreements outlining roles, responsibilities, and boundaries.
Red Quill Society does not enter partnerships that require:
We do not lend our name, materials, or credibility to campaigns that compromise independence.
In all partnerships:
Collaboration does not dilute responsibility.
All partnerships must align with:
Where alignment is not possible, partnership does not proceed.
When working with Indigenous nations or local communities, partnerships are built on:
Evidence stewardship does not override community rights.
Financial support or in-kind assistance does not confer:
Donors support the mission — they do not steer it.
Organisations or individuals interested in working with Red Quill Society should be prepared to discuss:
Not all inquiries result in partnerships.
That selectivity is intentional.
Environmental accountability work fails when independence is blurred.
Clear, principled partnerships allow Red Quill Society to collaborate effectively — without sacrificing credibility, safety, or trust.
Collaboration strengthens evidence.
Boundaries protect it.
Red Quill Society vs. Expedition Audacity Research Foundation
While Red Quill Society and the Expedition Audacity Research Foundation share values around integrity, responsibility, and evidence, their partnership models serve very different purposes.
Understanding that distinction matters.
Collaborative & Programmatic Partnerships
EAR partnerships are designed to support:
EAR partnerships are often co-creative, forward-looking, and designed to generate shared outputs, learning, and public benefit.
Independent & Evidence-Bound Partnerships
RQS partnerships exist to support:
RQS partnerships are deliberately constrained.
They prioritise:
Collaboration supports the work — it does not shape conclusions.
Some work benefits from openness, collaboration, and shared creation.
Other work demands restraint, distance, and clear separation from influence.
Maintaining distinct partnership models allows both organisations to operate credibly and effectively — without blurring mandates or compromising trust.
EAR partnerships build futures.
RQS partnerships protect facts.
Both matter.
They just operate differently.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.